Skip to main content


Table 2 Distribution of papers by review questions

From: Ontological specification of quality of chronic disease data in EHRs to support decision analytics: a realist review

Review questions Number %
1. How is data quality being conceptualized within the "fitness for purpose" definition for a range of uses? 6 12%
2. What specification methodologies are being used to specify data quality for implementation? 16 31%
3. What ontology-specified implementations are being used and how do they compare with other methods? 2 4%
4. How is the impact of implementing ontology-based specifications for data quality in chronic disease management being measured and evaluated? 28 54%
  1. Note: Total papers >52 because each paper may be classified as two or more study types, or may address two or more review questions.